Do you understand how scary this picture is
god forbid a real person do real person things he wasnt just a robot who killed people jesus fucking christ
uh yeah its not like he killed and tortured six million jews or anything
Hold on just a tick. Listen, I’m Jewish, so I’m perfectly capable of understanding that what he did was just…..well, there are no words for it. But let’s not round it up to simply Jews that got killed. It was six million people that died in those camps, not just Jews. Did you know that homosexuals were sent there, too? Yeah, I’m sure you did. They had to wear special little symbols on their clothes. Do you know what it was? It was a pink triangle.
It was six million PEOPLE.
But you let that roll over in your mind for a while and you are going to forever see this man as a monster, but that’s not what he was. He was someone who thought he was truly doing something right for his nation, no matter how shitty he was doing it. Believe me when I say that I don’t like him. I really don’t. My grandfather’s brothers died in those camps, and my grandfather escaped to Spain, then to Mexico. He was lucky.
This is not a monster holding hands with a little girl.
This is Adolf Hitler, a man, holding hands with a little girl.
Yeah. It’s fucking scary. It really is. Do you know why?
It’s because you’re seeing that he wasn’t, in fact, a monster. You’re seeing in this picture that he was a man. He was a man, and that’s really the saddest part of it all.
As a History major who specializes in the history of early modern Europe, I’ve studied a lot of dictators in detail, not just Hitler. The number one mistake anyone could ever make in history is making the assumption that only inhuman monsters are capable of doing terrible things.
Stop dehumanizing Hitler just so you can reassure yourself that “normal” humans aren’t capable of doing bad things. Hitler liked children and dogs, he was a vegetarian and he cried like a little boy when his mother died. I’m not saying he was a good, innocent person, but when you stop attributing human characteristics to historical figures like Hitler, it’s how you overlook people just like him in real life, and it’s how people like him end up back in power.
That last statement.
I completely agree. It’s part and parcel of a lot of the other mistakes people make when they look at history – especially “why didn’t they see it coming” hindsight is 20-20 crap.
Though, point of fact, Hitler (or, more accurately, the Nazi’s as a whole) killed 6 million Jews. Everyone else who he killed (3 million POWs from the USSR, roughly 2 million Polish people, around a million Romani, about 200,000 disabled people, and around 200,000 other people including every homosexual and Jehovah’s Witness they could find) makes a total death toll for just the Holocaust (not the rest of World War 2) impossible to calculate precisely, but it’s thought to be somewhere between 10 and 20 million people. (It depends on if you count the 6 million USSR civilians who died).
The war that the Nazi party started killed around 60,000,000 people. Or, a number equal to a third of the populations of the United States. Or, a number equal to 2.5% of ALL OF THE PEOPLE who were alive in the WORLD when the war started. Nearly 3 out of a hundred people.
It’s terrifying that he thought he was doing what he thought was best. It’s terrifying to realize that he was a man, not a monster, and he liked things that regular people liked. But it’s important to remember, too. Because when you look at someone and only see a monster, you start to expect that all bad people look like monsters, you think that people aren’t nuanced.
They are nuanced. And no matter how terrible their actions, they will still look like people. Because they *are*.
(note: this is my point of view, anyway, speaking as a Jew whose grandfather fought in Europe and who has a photo album filled with my grandmother’s friends from the old country – Poland – none of whose names we know and none of whom survived)
Reblogging for hard truths. The worst monsters of all look exactly like me and thee, live in the same flesh as me and thee. But you can tell them by their actions – and how they justify those actions.
[like the above poster, we have not branches but entire TREES of family that disappeared from Eastern Europe. When we say “forgive but never forget” this is what we mean: never forget that hatred and fear can lead to ten million and more horribly, brutally murdered. Never forget that it starts with a few humans justifying evil-for-a-cause.]
Tag Archives: i do politics
Hahahaha, it’s funny because she won’t get the job, since she is overqualified, and young part-time workers are cheaper.
Anyone who thinks our generation are lazy, unambitious layabouts… need to fucking lay down and die.
The harsh reality is that we are over-ambitious. We are told we can’t get anywhere without a good college degree, so we study hard, and learn all we can, and walk away with a piece of paper and skills to back it up… then we fight to break into a workforce that is already filled.
Every year more people graduate college, and the competition keeps mounting. There are a finite number of jobs, and the big-business fat-cats are cutting every corner they can to get away with NOT hiring new people, in order to maximise profits for themselves.Then there’s the other problem of people having to work MULTIPLE jobs to support their families. Because they’re not paid enough to live on just one, they need to work three jobs to make ends meet – and that means two more jobs are filled by one person.
I’m not saying it’s “greedy” to work multiple jobs – I’m saying it’s disgusting that people are paid so little in them that they need to.How are we supposed to get jobs when the job market is so limited – there’s not even enough work for everyone to have ONE job, much less two or three.
And the people who maintain the unemployment system have no idea how bad it really is – because they’ve had their jobs for twenty fucking years or more.The only big company I know of that hired a graduate from my college did so because he invented a system that would cut their work down by almost 50%. That is what you need to do to get a job around here.
I have applied for every job I am qualified for.
I have applied for jobs I am almost qualified for.
I have applied for entry-level retail and fast-food jobs.
I have gotten nowhere.And now I have the added bonus of being unable to work much at all due to my health issues. The irony of this is that I will be better off on disability – I will have the freedom to stop searching for dead-end temporary jobs, and be able to take the time to work on my own games and such. Albeit slow and in small bursts.
Exactly.
Also, employers want relevant experience, even for entry level jobs. Most job postings for waitressing require 2 years minimum of waitressing experience. I’m not even talking about fancy restaurants, I mean bussing tables in a pizza bar.The problem of breaking into the job market at all is something seriously fucked up. No-one wants to hire an 18 year old when they can hire a 14 year old for the bare minimum. No-one will hire a 21 year old who is legally required to be paid a full adult wage if they can get anyone younger.
Getting into university was so important that I couldn’t even consider paid employment until finishing year 12. When I started applying for entry level fast food jobs at age 17? Rejection after rejection. If I got any feedback at all it was “Sorry, you don’t have any relevant experience” or ”We can’t know you’ll be able to cope with the work, since you’ve never worked before.”
AH, yes! How did I ever forget to mention the “experience barrier” – everyone trying to break into a job has to contend with this.
They want to take on someone with lots of experience – 2 years, 4 years, sometimes 6 or more.
I see things like “4 years, and you must have worked on at least Multi-Million Dollar Film, or AAA Game.”Now how on earth am I going to do that if I can’t even get my foot in the door at fucking McDonalds?
And you know why they can put “2 years minimum experience” on their ads? Because there are plenty of people out there looking for those jobs with 2, 4, 8 years of experience in that role who need a job desperately.
If you want to work, you basically have to know someone in the company. If your parents run the joint, you can get in there, and get that experience. My sister has no trouble finding work now, because she has a couple years of experience – she got her first job through a combination of lying, and making very good friends with a number of people who worked there, by going to parties.
She barely made it through tenth grade.
I graduated 12th grade and college.She has a job.
I don’t.The system is broken, and only maintains a broken status quo. It puts barriers up to the outsiders, and puts minimal value on the insiders.
Humans are expendable assets – if they fire you, there’s a queue of people waiting to do your job.Then there are places that exploit internships.
Some companies bring students in to work for a month for free – the old “pay you in experience” trick. Problem is, they’re not giving you the level of experience you need to secure a job, and there are dozens more students and graduates who want to get those unpaid internships, So they can just keep getting work from desperate students and grads for free.
It’s like all those artists who get asked to do something “for the exposure” – the exposure is an empty promise, and they really just want you to work for free.
The big CEOs want to keep their billion-dollar bank accounts floating. And they don’t care who has to suffer and die for that to happen.
If you wonder why so many young people are trying to make a name for themselves on the internet – “social media stars” and whatnot – it’s because it’s about the only chance we have to do something and be noticed.
We now have platforms where we can put ourselves out there, and try to make money based on our talents.Is it a long-shot?
Absolutely.But it’s about the only chance we have.
This right here explains every thing read closely children cause it’s important
Even if you know someone in the company, it will not get your foot in the door. Even if you get an interview, there are companies out there that as soon as they find out you are friends with the person you interviewed with, they will throw away your application immediately, on the grounds that you only got the interview because you know them and therefore aren’t qualified. It doesn’t matter if you are the most qualified applicant for that position — they will not hire you. They will not even call you back.
If a 7 year old realises gender stereotyping is wrong and you don’t, something is very wrong with you.
Fuck this infographic so hard
Quick history lesson infographic:
13, 14, 15th Amendments—passed in the 1860’s
At that time Republicans believed in social reform etc etc etc
Democrats were much more conservative (originally getting their name from a title Jackson picked (he’s the biggest jerk of all in my opinion))
Following Reconstruction we enter the Progressive Era
The Progressive Era came about to take care of political corruption etc
During that time Taft split the Republican party (hi Bull Moose)
This allowed the Democrats to take control
But they couldn’t keep control because they had only won because they had gotten votes from those who didn’t support Taft
That forced them to change their views and become more moderate
Over time the pendulum swung completely over
Now Democrats are the party of social reform etc
And Republicans are the Conservatives
Ever heard of the term “Southern Democrat”? Yeah.
When white western men condemn muslim men for misogyny, they’re not doing it because they give a fuck about women, because if they did they’d start by addressing the sexism they perpetuate personally. They don’t give a fuck about women, they want an excuse to be racist.
This is so relevant it’s not even funny.
That vanity issue. Telling they’re worthless if they don’t look dolled up, but are shallow if they doll themselves up.
They’ve done studies that prove this is absolutely true (not that any of you doubted it). Sheryl Sandberg wrote about it a lot in Lean In, in the context of how bosses and job applicants are perceived. It’s known as the Heidi/Howard experiment. A man and a woman with equal accomplishments are viewed completely differently. Women are viewed as either nice or competent – not both.
BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL BILL NYE THE SCIENCE GUY
ba ba BOOM
*dumbfounded*
Religious people can’t engineer or solve complex problems?
People think this is a smart thing to say?
He’s not saying “religious people”, not at all. Nye isn’t the anti-religious Richard Dawkins type. He’s specifically talking about young earth creationism, the anti-science idea that the planet and universe are 6000 years old and the line is regarding his recent debate with Ken Ham, head of the incredibly racist Creation Museum.
Here’s the thing, the religious people who built the above structures weren’t anti-science, anti-knowledge, anti-learing, these cultures valued these things. When you’re training your child that evolution is an evil lie, that the planet is 6000 years old, that all the natural formations on earth were formed by some physically impossible massive flood, that the craters on the moon were formed by geysers errupting from earth and hitting it during said flood, that dinosaurs were on the ark, that all of humanity came from one dudes family after that flood around 4k years ago, that the son of Noah who was cursed that his descendents would be servants were the ones who went to Africa (a view which has been used to justify slavery extensively, EVEN TO THIS DAY), that the Loch Ness Monster is actually a dinosaur and proof of God’s creation, that ‘secularism’ has corrputed science and turned it against god, etc. etc. etc. then you are seriously disadvantaging that child when it comes to learning anything in the sciences.
Nye isn’t condemning religion, he’s condemning right wing extremist evangelical young earth creationism, and in a wold where a lack in scientific literacy is currently harming our ecosystem and reducing our species odds of survival, and as someone who was raised in this fucked up mindset (the reason I know so much about what they teach is because I was taught it as a child), I think his point holds absolutely true when taken in context.
Thanks for the context
Holy shit, someone got corrected on tumblr and didn’t throw a fit over it. Four for you ileolai.
A man is commanding – a woman is demanding.
A man is forceful – a woman is pushy.
A man is uncompromising – a woman is a ballbreaker.
A man is a perfectionist – a woman’s a pain in the ass.
He’s assertive – she’s aggressive.
He strategizes – she manipulates.
He shows leadership – she’s controlling.
He’s committed – she’s obsessed.
He’s persevering – she’s relentless.
He sticks to his guns – she’s stubborn.
If a man wants to get it right, he’s looked up to and respected.
If a woman wants to get it right, she’s difficult and impossible.If he acts, produces and directs, he’s called multi-talented. If she does the same thing, she’s called vain and egotistical.
It’s been said that a man’s reach should exceed his grasp. Why can’t that be true for a woman?