Tag Archives: feminism

staxilicious:

dorkilybeautiful:

Can we talk, just for a second, about how many neurotypical people commit violent crime?  Or, you know, people who don’t have a mental illness who do the same?  

How about how many people who live with autism or who are otherwise non-neurotyical are not, in fact, psychopaths, sociopaths, or otherwise violent?  And how all of those things are different things?  

And can we maybe acknowledge that while Elliott Rodger clearly does have some things going on with his brain, that does not change the fact that he made his motives abundantly clear, or that there are entire communities of men who believe that punishing women for being autonomous is an acceptable mode of behavior.  

Autism and mental illness are not the problem here.

Stop treating people with autism and mental illness like they are dangerous or less-than or somehow incapable of being humane and decent.  

Stop ignoring rape culture and misogyny and giving fucking murderers the benefit of the doubt because those things happened to occur in the same space as autism or mental illness.

just a side note, there are a fuck ton of people out there in the world who are sociopathic and still manage to NOT KILL PEOPLE. 

People who are homicidal commit homicide. They may or may not have other issues going on, but homicidal is definitely the big key. 

Autistic people are no more likely to kill people than schizophrenic people OR COMPLETELY NORMAL HEALTHY PEOPLE. 

In this instance it was a dude-bro with serious entitlement issues thinking that rejection was a legitimate reason for homicide, and having an entire community of supporters telling him that he is right. 

Personally, all of those people supporting this guy on his youtube video are suspect in my book. Not for what this guy did today, but for what they are capable of doing tomorrow, or the next day. My ability to extend them a modicum of TRUST to NOT KILL WOMEN is really lacking right this minute. 

spyderqueen:

Okay, let’s say  he has an actual mental illness (other than Narcissistic Personality Disorder, which seems pretty likely).  Mental Illness does not exist in a vacuum.  There’s a reason that people reported hearing voices in the 1500s  heard God and saints but people in the 1960s heard aliens and the CIA. If this guy hadn’t been raised in a culture that taught him he was owed a woman and sex, this is not how things would have gone down.

Also, again, even if he has an actual mental illness, he was mentally competent – he made manifestos and plans, and IANAL but I’m pretty sure he’d be ruled competent to stand trial were he alive.

I’m not letting the cops off the hook on this though; they were told about this guy and did nothing.

bigangry:

Copypasted from my facebook: 

So yeah, elephant in the room time. Let’s talk about the misogynistic asswaffle that killed the 6 people and wounded 7 more in San Bernadino.

Dude was a Men’s Rights Activist, and he was also a regular on PUAHate, which is “Pick Up Artist Hate” — a message board for men that had spent lots of money on Pick Up Artist seminars and books and shit to “coerce” women into having sex with them, failed, and wanted to vent about what bitches women are and how the expensive magic tickets to pussy they spent so much time and money on didn’t work for them. PUA stuff is repulsive; it often includes stuff like “negging” which means insulting and treating women like shit and expecting them to think that the man is “Alpha-male as fuck” and dropping everything to have sex with him. The murderer often used the term alpha-male in his videos and manifesto.

If you’re ever wanting to get nauseated from reading stuff on the internet, check out the Men’s Rights subreddit, it’s truly a cesspool. (And I’m not going to link it here.)

Anyway, shithead was fully immersed in a culture of absolute, seething hatred of women for their being autonomous. He was convinced of the existence of the “Friendzone” — the imaginary “zone” that women put men that like them into to deny them sex and still keep them around. The thing is, a) just because you’re hanging out with a woman and being nice to them doesn’t entitle you to sex, and b) if you’re hanging out with a woman and being nice to her solely for the purpose of getting your dick wet, you’re an awful friend.

Assmaster here was an entitlement bitch. He felt entitled to lose his virginity because he thought he was a “supreme nice guy” and deserved women throwing their vaginae at him for basically existing. The societal pressure on him, and on men, to lose their virginity and “BECOME A MAN!” or whatever, is a product of patriarchy — the same patriarchy that puts societal pressure on women to stay precious virgins AT ALL COSTS so that they can give their virginity as a gift to their deserving husband on their wedding night. It’s the same patriarchy that calls women sluts and whores for having sex, and high-fives men for doing the same. It makes Dads over-protective, shotgun-wielding threats to their daughter’s dates, and makes them give their sons pep-talks to get out there and bang some chicks.

This is a ridiculous double-standard, and that, and dickwads like loser here, are why the world needs feminism.

There’s a hashtag on twitter that started yesterday,https://twitter.com/search?q=%23yesallwomen&src=typd‪#‎YesAllWomen‬— and it’s hard to read, and difficult to swallow, but it’s necessary to get the point across: “Not ALL men do stuff like this guy” is not helping. “Yes ALL women” feel menaced by men, “Yes ALL women” get harassed on the street, “Yes ALL women” are victims of the ridiculous double-standards of sexism and misogyny. If you’re a man, I suggest reading it, not defending, and just soaking it all in. If you’re a woman, I suggest reading it, and commiserating or adding in your experiences.

Misogyny and sexism are rampant in this world, and, to quote patrickat, “Think of where the human race could be right now if we hadn’t spent the better part of history refusing half the population a contribution.”

nymphamortem:

“Well girls, keep that in mind next time your friendzone somebody!”

THIS IS A TERROR CAMPAIGN

YOU’RE TELLING US YOU’LL LITERALLY MURDER US IF WE DON’T SPREAD OUR LEGS FOR YOU OR IF WE DON’T DATE YOU

THAT’S IT THAT’S THE WHOLE MESSAGE

YOU WANT US TO LIVE IN FEAR AND WE SURE DO

I WANT TO FUCKING CRY

thorrson:

dumblr-feminist:

officialmillerhighlife:

norcalnoise:

ianoshea:

phrux:

shinigamihime:

oliasis:

notyour-sidekick:

kleenexwoman:

did-you-kno:

Source

I have a few copies of “Playboy” from the 1970s stashed away somewhere. One of them has a letter where a guy writes in saying, “I met this really gorgeous, sweet woman, and we were planning to get married, but she sat me down yesterday and told me that she had a sex change before she met me. Mr. Hefner, should I marry someone who used to be a man?” and the response was, “So she had a sex change, big whoop. Would you be asking this question if she’d made any other change in her life before she met you? You love the woman she is now, and that’s all that should matter. If you want kids you can adopt or something.”

I feel so conflicted right now

Do you guys SERIOUSLY not know that Hugh Hefner is super respectful of women and doesn’t play around with peoples misogynistic bullshit?

just because you want to be surrounded by hot ladies 24/7 doesn’t mean you’re a douchebag

not being a douchebag is the best way to be surrounded by hot ladies 24/7

Should also be noted, from watching The Girls Next Door, the Playmates decide on everything they do. All photoshoots and all the spreads in the magazines and calendars are their ideas and their doing. Hef is only there to give his stamp of approval.

None of those girls do things they don’t want to do, and he’s supportive of whatever.

i actually love this man

Hefner is one classy dude I love this man.

Ilu hef

How can there be a war on women when one of them just got promoted to the highest office at Yahoo!? The depressing part is that she’s pregnant and yet still took the position. There is a war, but that war is being waged on good family values. Now I ask you, is it responsible to take on the job of CEO of a billion dollar corporation when you are about to have a child? I think not my friend. Marissa Mayer belongs at home with her baby, not running a company. Her child needs a mother. I know what it is like to be in charge of a company, I ran Bain until 20… ah, 1999. There is no feasible way she can adequately raise her child and be a successful CEO. It’s one or the other.

Willard Mitt Romney

The sad part is that Willard doesn’t even notice he answered his own damn question right there…

(via freedominwickedness)

Side note: I love how he trips up on the date he ran Bain at. To people not following that story, in order to distance himself from decisions made at Bain under his leadership he and his proxies have tried to claim he had nothing to do with it after 1999, even though he was the CEO and drew paychecks and flew back for meetings (plus however much business he took care of by phone/email/what have you) for years afterwards.

When he ran for MA governor after years of living and working in Utah, to prove his residency and establish ties to the state for voters he used the fact that he was running Bain during those years as proof. Now that it’s inconvenient, he says he wasn’t… he was happy to draw an executive paycheck but he did nothing for the company. He did nothing since 1999 and “retroactively retired” when he realized that.

It’s such a complete and total lie that he can’t keep it straight on the stump. 

(via alexandraerin)